RE: Slow queries after Windows startup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From POUSSEL, Guillaume
Subject RE: Slow queries after Windows startup
Date
Msg-id DB5PR0201MB1575AC400C83861672EA08F59C160@DB5PR0201MB1575.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
Thanks for pointing out those links. I am trying to figure out how they can help me.
One more thing, I can't understand the postgresql.log duration vs. a "EXPLAIN ANALYZE" in the query:
Postgresql.log gives:
duration: 628.000 ms  parse (...)
duration: 0.000 ms  bind  (...)
duration: 378.000 ms  execute (...)

EXPLAIN gives:
(...)
I/O Timings: read=0.019
(...)
Total runtime: 0.167 ms

Where are all these milliseconds (378ms vs. 0.167ms)?
What can be slowing down the query parsing?


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Robert Zenz [mailto:robert.zenz@sibvisions.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 11 janvier 2018 10:55
À : pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org
Objet : Re: Slow queries after Windows startup

I have no idea to be honest, I haven't done any Windows administration in a long time.

The best I could find is this:

 * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/rammap
 * https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc938589.aspx


On 11.01.2018 10:06, POUSSEL, Guillaume wrote:
> No, I have not checked it.
> How can I monitor it on Windows? Do you know a tool that can help me?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Robert Zenz [mailto:robert.zenz@sibvisions.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 11 janvier 2018 10:01
> À : pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org
> Objet : Re: Slow queries after Windows startup
>
> Have you verified that this is isn't caused by cold filesystem caches?
>
>
> On 11.01.2018 09:19, POUSSEL, Guillaume wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m running PostgreSQL 9.3 on Windows 7 and I’m having a performance
>> issue at startup. I have installed PostgreSQL as a service through
>> Windows installer.
>>
>> The database size is 3 Go, with 120 tables.
>>
>>
>>
>> Every time I try to run queries right after Windows startup, it takes
>> a huge amount of time.
>>
>> If I restart the PostgreSQL Windows service, queries are way faster.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have activated debug log and here is what I get before Windows restart:
>>
>> duration: 2.000 ms  parse
>>
>> duration: 3.000 ms  bind
>>
>> duration: 0.000 ms  execute
>>
>> And after Windows restart:
>>
>> duration: 364.000 ms  parse
>>
>> duration: 415.000 ms  bind
>>
>> duration: 0.000 ms  execute
>>
>>
>> For information, the test query is:
>>
>> SELECT t.typlen FROM pg_catalog.pg_type t, pg_catalog.pg_namespace n
>> WHERE t.typnamespace=n.oid AND t.typname='name' AND n.nspname='pg_catalog'
>>
>> It’s not related to the query itself since other queries give the
>> same result (from 10x to 100x longer).
>>
>>
>>
>> Here are my settings (all log and locale-related settings omitted on
>> purpose):
>>
>>
>> bytea_output
>>
>> escape
>>
>> session
>>
>>
>> checkpoint_segments
>>
>> 45
>>
>> configuration file
>>
>>
>> client_encoding
>>
>> UNICODE
>>
>> session
>>
>>
>> client_min_messages
>>
>> notice
>>
>> session
>>
>>
>> DateStyle
>>
>> ISO, DMY
>>
>> session
>>
>>
>> debug_pretty_print
>>
>> on
>>
>> configuration file
>>
>>
>> debug_print_plan
>>
>> on
>>
>> configuration file
>>
>>
>> default_text_search_config
>>
>> pg_catalog.french
>>
>> configuration file
>>
>>
>> listen_addresses
>>
>> *
>>
>> configuration file
>>
>>
>> logging_collector
>>
>> on
>>
>> configuration file
>>
>>
>> max_connections
>>
>> 100
>>
>> configuration file
>>
>>
>> max_stack_depth
>>
>> 2MB
>>
>> environment variable
>>
>>
>> port
>>
>> 5432
>>
>> configuration file
>>
>>
>> shared_buffers
>>
>> 128MB
>>
>> configuration file
>>
>>
>> TimeZone
>>
>> GMT
>>
>> user
>>
>>
>>
>> I run queries through JDBC driver (9.3-1100-jdbc4.jar). I know that
>> the issue is not related to the PC, since it give the same result on
>> a bunch of different computers.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have two questions:
>>
>> *         What is the difference between restarting PostgreSQL service and
>> restarting the computer? Is PostgreSQL relying on some kind of
>> OS-level cache outside Windows service?
>>
>> *         How can I dig down deeper and see what’s causing PostgreSQL
>> slowdown?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your help,
>>
>> BR,
>>
>>
>>
>> Guillaume POUSSEL | ♠Sogeti High Tech
>>
>>  <mailto:guillaume.poussel@sogeti.com> guillaume.poussel@sogeti.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group.
Itis intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not
authorizedto read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you
receivethis message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. 
>>
>>
>>
>> This message contains information that may be privileged or
>> confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed.
Ifyou are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or
usethis message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
deleteall copies of this message. 
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It
isintended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized
toread, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this
messagein error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. 
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
Date:
Subject: Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?
Next
From: Imre Samu
Date:
Subject: Re: Using 9.6 client with 10.0 server