Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2077EC242@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> Thanks for the review.  Attached patches are revised version, though
> only fdw_helper_v5.patch is unchanged.

Two questions:
- Is it on purpose that you can specify all SSL client options except "sslcompression"?
- Since a rescan is done by rewinding the cursor, is it necessary to have any other remote isolation level than READ
COMMITED?There is only one query issued per transaction. 

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport?
Next
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage