Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date
Msg-id D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2073488E5@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> The syntax error messages are still inadequate; all I can get is
>> 'syntax error at or near "%s"'.  They should be more detailed.
> 
> this system is based on error messages that generates a plpgsql engine
> or bison engine. I can correct only a few percent from these messages
> :(
> 
> internally I didn't wrote a compiler or plpgsql checker - this is just
> tool that can emit some plpgsql interpret subprocess - and when these
> subprocesses raises exceptions, then takes their messages.

I see.

>> I think that at least the documentation should be improved before
>> I am ready to set this as "ready for committer".
> 
> please, can you send a correction to documentation or error messages?
> 
> I am not able to write documentation

I'll give it a try.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation