Re: please explain vacuum with WAL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: please explain vacuum with WAL
Date
Msg-id D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2024B0ABA@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: please explain vacuum with WAL  (Dmitry Melekhov <dm@belkam.com>)
List pgsql-general
Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
> So, if I have database backup and WAL generated after this backup, I can
> do recovery, this mean WAL already contains all changes to database,
> without vacuum.  Could you tell me what is wrong in my sentence?

VACUUM *is* a change to the database.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Leif B. Kristensen"
Date:
Subject: Re: select command doesnot work
Next
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: select command doesnot work