Re: NUMERIC x VARCHAR - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Michael Glaesemann
Subject Re: NUMERIC x VARCHAR
Date
Msg-id D909485D-EB69-11D8-831D-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NUMERIC x VARCHAR  (Er Galvão Abbott <galvao@galvao.eti.br>)
Responses Re: NUMERIC x VARCHAR  (Er Galvão Abbott <galvao@galvao.eti.br>)
List pgsql-performance
On Aug 11, 2004, at 4:27 PM, Er Galvão Abbott wrote:

> It will. As I've said I wont be storing any symbols.

It won't store leading zeros, however. This may or may not be an issue
for you.


test=# create table tel (name_id integer not null, tel_numeric
numeric(15) not null, tel_varchar varchar(15) not null);
CREATE TABLE
test=# insert into tel (name_id, tel_numeric, tel_varchar) values
(1,012345678911234, '012345678911234');
INSERT 17153 1
test=# select * from tel;
  name_id |  tel_numeric   |   tel_varchar
---------+----------------+-----------------
        1 | 12345678911234 | 012345678911234
(1 row)

I would do as another poster suggested: create a telephone number
domain as text with the check constraints you desire.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Er Galvão Abbott
Date:
Subject: Re: NUMERIC x VARCHAR
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware upgrade for a high-traffic database