> On 18 Mar 2025, at 16:07, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2025-03-18 10:45:41 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Thanks for doing that, I'll try to get this in during a break in todays conference.
>
> Thanks to both of you for fixing this!
No worries, this has now been committed. Whether or not we can do anything for
backbranches is another discussion.
> I wonder how we could make it easier to find stuff like this and 274bbced853,
> it's pretty painful right now. The SSLKEYLOGFILE stuff being discussed would
> help, but would still require somebody breaking out wireshark or such.
> Perhaps some added trace messages or such?
Maybe, but I fear that most of the interesting tracepoints would be inside
OpenSSL rather than in libpq. Definitely worth investigatint though.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
