Re: PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique' qualifier - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dann Corbit
Subject Re: PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique' qualifier
Date
Msg-id D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154757DD88@postal.corporate.connx.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique' qualifier  ("Wm.A.Stafford" <stafford@marine.rutgers.edu>)
List pgsql-general
UNIQUE index:
http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/books/aw_pgsql/node108.htm
l

UNIQUE constraint:
http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/books/aw_pgsql/node129.htm
l

Online manual information:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/ddl-constraints.html#AEN2
058
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/indexes-unique.html

There is a little search box in the upper right hand corner that might
prove helpful for your cause.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Wm.A.Stafford
> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 12:13 PM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique'
qualifier
>
> I hope the subject says it all.  I'm porting an Oracle-centric
> application to PostgreSQL and the Oracle sql is full of the 'unique'
> qualifier.  I'm assuming PostgreSQL does not support 'unique' since
> don't see a 'unique' anywhere in the PostgreSQL docs.  Is there a
> substitute or a technique to get the same result?
>
> Thanks,
> -=bill stafford
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique'
Next
From: Michael Glaesemann
Date:
Subject: Re: More on unique vs distinct