Yes, autovacuum is better.
I am a fossil from 7.1.3 days.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com
[mailto:Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 2:10 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org; pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org;
Mark
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] need an advice on running Database
Do you not recommend autovacuum?
Rick
"Dann Corbit"
<DCorbit@connx.com> To: "Mark"
<sendmailtomark@yahoo.com>, <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent by: cc:
pgsql-general-owner@pos Subject: Re:
[GENERAL] need an advice on running Database
tgresql.org
01/19/2005 04:30 PM
Once per day dump database to disk.
Once per day do a vacuum full.
That should be plenty.
Since there are 1440 minutes per day, you are only looking at 288
transactions per day. Not exactly a taxing transaction load.
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 12:41 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] need an advice on running Database
Hi,
I have a small data base ~ 10 tables. each table get
insert/update/delete few times a day. postgresql is running for a
month.
The load will increase in the near future: insert/update/delete
activity will be at least one in 5 minutes.
What maintenance should I need to do?
Thanks,
Mark.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page - Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
