> From 9f7c96dfab4d807e668c9d32b44db5f4ff122e15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:55:56 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH v2 02/10] Don't define HAVE_[GSSAPI_]GSSAPI_EXT_H
>
> The check for gssapi_ext.h was added in f7431bca8b0. As we require
> gssapi_ext.h to be present, there's no point in defining symbols for the
> header presence.
>
> While at it, use cc.has_header() instead of cc.check_header(), that's a bit
> cheaper and it seems improbably that gssapi.h would compile while gssapi_ext.h
> would not.
improbable
Other than that, it looks pretty solid. Looks like we could help future
us out by teaching compiler.find_library() to take a list of names to
look at similar to how dependency() works now.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@partin.io>
--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)
