Hi,
On 2024-07-16 15:53:45 -0500, Tristan Partin wrote:
> Other than that, it looks pretty solid.
Thanks for looking! I'm thinking of pushing the first few patches soon-ish.
I'm debating between going for 17 + HEAD or also applying it to 16, to keep
the trees more similar.
> Looks like we could help future us out by teaching compiler.find_library()
> to take a list of names to look at similar to how dependency() works now.
Yep, that'd be useful.
Andres
