Hello ,
Some new input:
On slave, all domains ( with checks) have been replaced by a simple type. No crash on slave since this bypass.
Is there something to fix in the ActiveSnapshot code ?
BR
> Le 18 juil. 2018 à 17:03, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit :
>
> Mai Peng <maily.peng@webedia-group.com> writes:
>> Here the backtrace
>
> Hmm .. so this can be summarized as "logical replication workers should
> provide an ActiveSnapshot in case the user functions they call want one".
> Makes me wonder how much other transactional infrastructure is needed
> but not present.
>
> regards, tom lane
