Re: DRAFT 9.6 release - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)
Subject Re: DRAFT 9.6 release
Date
Msg-id CS1PR84MB021400192648A5511E837C76D7E20@CS1PR84MB0214.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DRAFT 9.6 release  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: DRAFT 9.6 release  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
> So, I have to say, this doesn't *feel* like a major press-worthy feature yet.  It
> will be in 10, but is it right now?

For me the press-worthy side of this in its current state is that it allows for a no-data loss guarantee in the event
ofa network partition.
 

Having more than two sync copies of data is pretty major in my opinion as well.

Brad.

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: DRAFT 9.6 release
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: DRAFT 9.6 release