When does sequential performance matter in PG? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From henk de wit
Subject When does sequential performance matter in PG?
Date
Msg-id COL104-W4301D2DDC445A99E55E086F5A10@phx.gbl
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: When does sequential performance matter in PG?
Re: When does sequential performance matter in PG?
List pgsql-performance
Hi,

It is frequently said that for PostgreSQL the number 1 thing to pay attention to when increasing performance is the amount of IOPS a storage system is capable of. Now I wonder if there is any situation in which sequential IO performance comes into play. E.g. perhaps during a tablescan on a non-fragmented table, or during a backup or restore?

The reason I'm asking is that we're building a storage array and for some reason are unable to increase the number of random IOPS beyond a certain threshold when we add more controllers or more (SSD) disks to the system. However, the sequential performance keeps increasing when we do that.

Would this extra sequential performance be of any benefit to PG or would it just be wasted?

Kind regards


Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Carey
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Query much slower when run from postgres function
Next
From: Matthew Wakeling
Date:
Subject: Re: When does sequential performance matter in PG?