Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade to clusters with a different WAL segmentsize - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bossart, Nathan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade to clusters with a different WAL segmentsize
Date
Msg-id CE058CA0-8C37-4F9C-8C33-27DAF3931E40@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade to clusters with a different WAL segmentsize  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade to clusters with a different WAL segmentsize  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Here is a new set of patches that addresses most of Peter's feedback.
I've split it into four pieces:

  0001: Fix division-by-zero error in pg_controldata
  0002: Fix division-by-zero error in pg_resetwal
  0003: Allow users to specify WAL segment size in pg_resetwal
  0004: Add long options to pg_resetwal (including --wal-segsize)

On 3/3/18, 12:22 PM, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The patch "Configurable file mode mask" contains the beginning of a test
> suite for pg_resetwal.  It would be great if we could get a test case
> for this new functionality implemented.

I haven't added a test case yet, as this thread [0] seems to still be
in-progress.

Nathan

[0] https://postgr.es/m/ad346fe6-b23e-59f1-ecb7-0e08390ad629%40pgmasters.net
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixes for missing schema qualifications
Next
From: David Gould
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] BUG #15005: ANALYZE can make pg_class.reltuplesinaccurate.