Re: comp.database.postgresql.* - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Max
Subject Re: comp.database.postgresql.*
Date
Msg-id CDEJIJMPHJJNHGFMBPBKMEKBFDAA.maxdl@adelphia.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: comp.database.postgresql.*  (Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
>
> > Honestly, people here generally don't give a hoot what the other 'big'
> > databases do (which is
>
> I tend to look at it from complete different angle.  Let's leave the
> group stuff for a while and think about SQL.  PostgreSQL seeks
> to conform SQL standards as much as it is reasonable.  I think
> it is good approach, I feel it's much better than creating a new SQL
> syntax for every obstacle encountered.

Absolutely!

>
> And now, some time ago, PostgreSQL mailing lists were gatewayed
> into Big8 namespace, to help people access them by other means.
> Only it was done "unoffically", i.e. not following standard procedure
> for such things.  It could be thought of as "hooking up" to neighbour's
> cable TV cables, only it does not involve stealing. ;)  Well, I'm sure
> it's easy to find many better comparable situations. ;)
> Anyway, it's a bit kludgy, not following standards.  It would be nice
> however to maybe go to the cable guys and tell them -- connect us
> officialy.  Not because Oracle users did so.  No, it's foolish reason.
> Because it's Right, because it makes us closer to Standards, because
> to be respected means to respect others.  Etc, etc. etc.

Nicely  put ;)

This is exactly what I was trying to say.

Max


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Max"
Date:
Subject: Re: comp.database.postgresql.*
Next
From: Steve Crawford
Date:
Subject: invalid page header in block 52979 of relation "pg_attribute"