On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:56 , Pat Maddox wrote:
> A bunch of options so far...but there's really no way to do this with
> standard SQL?
What do you mean by "standard SQL"? Trees aren't inherently relational.
> I'm starting to feel I'm better off just pulling the data I need and
> then building the tree structure in my app code.
Part of the issue is how do you *store* the tree in the database. You
have to encode that information somehow. These are all methods to do
that.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
