On Jun 16, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Put me down for +>.
>
> Since there are no other votes for that option (or, indeed, any other
> option), I'm going to go with my original instinct and change hstore
> => text[] to hstore & text[]. Patch to do that is attached.
Damn. My other argument is that & looks like boolean or bitwise AND, so the return of an hstore might be unexpected. +>
looksmore like an arrow (sort of).
But it doesn't much matter, as long as it works.
Best,
David
