Hi,
I'm running into behavior I don't understand when trying to do an UPSERT with Postgres. The docs would seem to indicate that the conflict target of the INSERT statement can be either an index expression or a constraint name. However, when attempting to reference the constraint name, I get a "column ... does not exist" error.
My first attempt was to just create a UNIQUE index, which works fine with the constraint inference:
create table kv (key text, value text, extra text);
create unique index kv_key_value on kv(key, value);
insert into kv (key, value) values ('k1', 'v1');
-- this works:
insert into kv (key, value, extra) values ('k1', 'v1', 'e1') on conflict (key, value) do update set extra=excluded.extra;
-- this does not
insert into kv (key, value, extra) values ('k1', 'v1', 'e1') on conflict (kv_key_value) do update set extra=excluded.extra;
Describing the above table, I see the following under "Indexes:"
"kv_key_value" UNIQUE, btree (key, value)
My second try was to put the unique constraint explicitly in the create table:
create table kv ( key text, value text, extra text, constraint kv_key_value unique(key, value));
Describing the above table, the output of "Indexes:" is slightly different ("UNIQUE CONSTRAINT" vs "UNIQUE" in previous example):
"kv_key_value" UNIQUE CONSTRAINT, btree (key, value)
However I am still unable to specify the constraint name as the conflict target:
insert into kv (key, value, extra) values ('k1', 'v1', 'e1') on conflict (kv_key_value) do update set extra=excluded.extra;
ERROR: column "kv_key_value" does not exist
LINE 2: on conflict (kv_key_value) do update set extra=exclude...
Am I misunderstanding something here? I totally get that I can use the equivalent expression and rely on constraint inference, but I'd like to know why the constraint name doesn't appear to work when the docs make it sound like it should?
Thanks so much for your help,
Charlie
