Re: jsonpath versus NaN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdv3djxi8jNoAnbsGj6QANz0gUi+8iKyms_=Ai_-L7ZjpQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonpath versus NaN  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:34 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Thank you for your answer. I'm trying to understand your point.
> Standard claims that .double() method should behave the same way as
> CAST to double.  However, standard references the standard behavior of
> CAST here, not behavior of your implementation of CAST.

Typo here: please read "our implementation of CAST" here.

> So, if we
> extend the functionality of standard CAST in our implementation, that
> doesn't automatically mean we should extend the .double() jsonpath
> method in the same way.  Is it correct?


------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: More tzdb fun: POSIXRULES is being deprecated upstream