Improve checking for pg_index.xmin - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Improve checking for pg_index.xmin
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfduk5Kh1bF9-8Xovgq78k9LyRUodFsfbmSAFuA_5kwbCPA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Improve checking for pg_index.xmin  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi!

Our customer faced with issue, when index is invisible after creation.
The reproducible case is following.

    $ psql db2
    # begin;
    # select txid_current();
$ psql db1
# select i as id, 0 as v into t from generate_series(1, 100000) i;
# create unique index idx on t (id);
# update t set v = v + 1 where id = 10000;
# update t set v = v + 1 where id = 10000;
# update t set v = v + 1 where id = 10000;
# update t set v = v + 1 where id = 10000;
# update t set v = v + 1 where id = 10000;
# drop index idx;
# create unique index idx on t (id);
# explain analyze select v from t where id = 10000;

There is no issue if there is no parallel session in database db2.
The fact that index visibility depends on open transaction in
different database is ridiculous for users.

This happens so, because we're checking that there is no broken HOT
chains after index creation by comparison pg_index.xmin and
TransactionXmin.   So, we check that pg_index.xmin is in the past for
current transaction in lossy way by comparison just xmins.  Attached
patch changes this check to XidInMVCCSnapshot().

With patch the issue is gone.  My doubt about this patch is that it
changes check with TransactionXmin to check with GetActiveSnapshot(),
which might be more recent.  However, query shouldn't be executer with
older snapshot than one it was planned with.

Any thoughts?

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: merging HashJoin and Hash nodes
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Allow 'sslkey' and 'sslcert' in postgres_fdw user mappings