Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Replace IN VALUES with ANY in WHERE clauses during optimization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Replace IN VALUES with ANY in WHERE clauses during optimization
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdugRg1Nix_82AsUQOcz6Q-761_Y440t9zQLwdhy+YcC2Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replace IN VALUES with ANY in WHERE clauses during optimization  (Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: Replace IN VALUES with ANY in WHERE clauses during optimization
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
Hi, Alena!

On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 5:33 PM Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
I prepared a patch according to my suggestions, it just checks that the transformation is not carried out if there is a var element, there are changes only in one test, but I think it is correct.

diff -U3 /home/alena/postgrespro_or3/src/test/regress/expected/subselect.out /home/alena/postgrespro_or3/src/test/regress/results/subselect.out
--- /home/alena/postgrespro_or3/src/test/regress/expected/subselect.out    2025-04-02 02:50:07.018329864 +0300
+++ /home/alena/postgrespro_or3/src/test/regress/results/subselect.out    2025-04-02 17:27:09.845104001 +0300
@@ -3027,18 +3027,15 @@
 SELECT ten FROM onek t WHERE unique1 IN (VALUES (0), ((2 IN
   (SELECT (3)))::integer)
 );
-                     QUERY PLAN                     
-----------------------------------------------------
- Nested Loop
-   ->  Unique
-         ->  Sort
-               Sort Key: "*VALUES*".column1
-               ->  Values Scan on "*VALUES*"
-                     SubPlan 1
-                       ->  Result
-   ->  Index Scan using onek_unique1 on onek t
-         Index Cond: (unique1 = "*VALUES*".column1)
-(9 rows)
+                                           QUERY PLAN                                           
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek t
+   Recheck Cond: (unique1 = ANY (ARRAY[0, ((ANY (2 = (hashed SubPlan 1).col1)))::integer]))
+   ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek_unique1
+         Index Cond: (unique1 = ANY (ARRAY[0, ((ANY (2 = (hashed SubPlan 1).col1)))::integer]))
+   SubPlan 1
+     ->  Result
+(6 rows)
 
 -- Alow to transformation and hold conversion between types of colemns and
 -- declared type of column pointed in RTE

Your patch turns back performance degradation issue that I mention in [1].

With your patch.
# explain analyze select * from test where val in (VALUES (5000), (4000), (9000), (2000), (1000), (140050), ((select 1)));
                                              QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on test  (cost=0.01..23175.01 rows=7 width=4) (actual time=0.455..417.929 rows=7.00 loops=1)
   Filter: (val = ANY (ARRAY[5000, 4000, 9000, 2000, 1000, 140050, (InitPlan 1).col1]))
   Rows Removed by Filter: 999993
   Buffers: shared hit=2362 read=2063
   InitPlan 1
     ->  Result  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1.00 loops=1)
 Planning Time: 0.211 ms
 Execution Time: 417.984 ms
(8 rows)

Without your patch.
# explain analyze select * from test where val in (VALUES (5000), (4000), (9000), (2000), (1000), (140050), ((select 1)));
                                                       QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Hash Semi Join  (cost=0.19..17050.26 rows=7 width=4) (actual time=0.289..210.335 rows=7.00 loops=1)
   Hash Cond: (test.val = "*VALUES*".column1)
   Buffers: shared hit=2211 read=2214
   InitPlan 1
     ->  Result  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1.00 loops=1)
   ->  Seq Scan on test  (cost=0.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=4) (actual time=0.203..85.925 rows=1000000.00 loops=1)
         Buffers: shared hit=2211 read=2214
   ->  Hash  (cost=0.09..0.09 rows=7 width=4) (actual time=0.067..0.068 rows=7.00 loops=1)
         Buckets: 1024  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 9kB
         ->  Values Scan on "*VALUES*"  (cost=0.00..0.09 rows=7 width=4) (actual time=0.004..0.023 rows=7.00 loops=1)
 Planning Time: 0.321 ms
 Execution Time: 210.409 ms
(12 rows)

Only when we have all consts in the array, we can have SAOP hashing which is competitive with hashing of VALUES node.  So, I'm continuing with my version of patch.

Links.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the log spam