Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfduaBnGckR3K9yCPM_pi2i+o_R534KkaquG4onPCLB5MDw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 3:42 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:52:13AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 06:00:59AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > I'm still seeing need for s/int/int64/ at:
>
> > I am attaching a patch for all these you have spotted, switching the
> > logs to use %llx.  Does that look fine for you?
>
> Yes.  I think that completes the project.

Thanks to everybody for working on this.  It's pity I didn't notice
this is v17 open item on me.  Sorry for this.

I tool a look on commits and on other slru code for similar issue.
Everything looks good for me.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.