Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder orpostorder traversal? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder orpostorder traversal?
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfduTcfYg26MReJtx3UvAz+yieRvdme=QnN2GGWqAUC_WpQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder or postorder traversal?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
In short, therefore, I propose we rip out the DirectWalk and InvertedWalk
options along with their support code, and then drop the portions of
test_rbtree that are needed to exercise them.  Any objections?

+1,
I don't see any point in leaving DirectWalk and InvertedWalk in RB-tree.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] log_destination=file
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the sametransaction