Re: Small GIN optimizations (after 9.4) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Small GIN optimizations (after 9.4)
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfduSEOAjDju9GBhBaiVczO25FB3md+U6z2VAGJJbLLBA=g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Small GIN optimizations (after 9.4)  (PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig<postgres@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Small GIN optimizations (after 9.4)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:31 PM, PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at> wrote:
i think there is one more thing which would be really good in GIN and which would solve a ton of issues.
atm GIN entries are sorted by item pointer.
if we could sort them by a "column" it would fix a couple of real work issues such as ...

        SELECT ... FROM foo WHERE "tsearch_query" ORDER BY price DESC LIMIT 10

... or so.
it many cases you want to search for a, say, product and find the cheapest / most expensive one.
if the tsearch_query yields a high number of rows (which it often does) the subsequent sort will kill you.

This is not intended to be a small change. However, some solution might be possible in post 9.4 gin improvements or in new secret indexing project which will be presented at PGCon :-)

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.  

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Small GIN optimizations (after 9.4)