Re: Remove an unnecessary check on semijoin_target_ok() on postgres_fdw.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Remove an unnecessary check on semijoin_target_ok() on postgres_fdw.c
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfduHWDS2PHzuwDcd2DdiB4KHAXT1iQzOdyuTYOjFpnHhVA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove an unnecessary check on semijoin_target_ok() on postgres_fdw.c  (Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Remove an unnecessary check on semijoin_target_ok() on postgres_fdw.c
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 3:39 AM Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alexander Pyhalov <a.pyhalov@postgrespro.ru> 于2024年11月29日周五 00:02写道:
>>
>> Tender Wang писал(а) 2024-10-09 10:26:
>> > Hi,
>> >    When I debug FDW join pushdown codes, I found below codes in
>> > semijoin_target_ok():
>> >     if (bms_is_member(var->varno, innerrel->relids) &&
>> >
>> >         !bms_is_member(var->varno, outerrel->relids))
>> >
>> > As far as I know, if a var belongs to the innerrel of joinrel, it's
>> > not possible that it
>> > may belong to the outerrel. So if the bms_is_member(var->varno,
>> > innerrel->relids)
>> > returns TRUE, then !bms_is_member(var->varno, outerrel->relids) must
>> > be TRUE.
>> > If bms_is_member(var->varno, innerrel->relids) returns FALSE,
>> > !bms_is_member(var->varno, outerrel->relids) will not execute due to
>> > short circuit.
>> >
>> > So I think we can remove the "!bms_is_member(var->varno,
>> > outerrel->relids)" from if.
>> > Any thoughts?
>>
>> Hi.
>> Seems good to me.
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Alexander Pyhalov,
>> Postgres Professional
>
>
> Thanks for looking at that.

Pushed.  But I've decided to keep the redundant check as an assertion.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Add semi-join pushdown to postgres_fdw
Next
From: Shubham Khanna
Date:
Subject: Re: Enhance 'pg_createsubscriber' to retrieve databases automatically when no database is provided.