Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdsv-s+qA_yAnVfQ6D+5_qN-ZbE5u1k-CO9a4qpAOBA1iA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe
List pgsql-committers
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 5:13 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 1:30 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> > > On Aug 13, 2024, at 6:35, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:.
> > >
> > > As pointed by Noah Misch [1], unlike the commit the patch [2] also
> > > changed segment-returning functions to return int64.  Thus, in the
> > > patch output formats make much more sense, because they match the
> > > input data types.  Michael, are you intended to push the remaining
> > > part of the patch [2]?
> >
> > Guess so. I could look at that next week, not before.
>
> OK.  I made an attached patch from the missing parts.
> Do you mind if I push that?  If yes, feel free to use it.

I mean, I'd like to push it if you don't object.
If you object and like to push it yourself, feel free to use this patch.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase



pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Add a couple of recent commits to .git-blame-ignore-revs.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe