On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 11:35 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2021-Sep-18, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> > I see now. I think I'm rather favoring splitting visibilitymap.h.
>
> Agreed, this looks sane to me. However, I think the
> VM_ALL_{VISIBLE,FROZEN} macros should remain in visibilitymap.h, since
> they depend on the visibilitymap_get_status function (and pg_upgrade
> doesn't use them).
>
> There's a typo "maros" for "macros" in the new header file. (Also, why
> does the copyright line say "portions" if no portion under another
> copyright? I think we don't say "portions" when there is only one
> copyright statement line.)
Thank you for the feedback. All changes are accepted.
Any objections to pushing this?
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
