Hi,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 3:06 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2021-09-18 02:51:09 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 6:53 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > > Without having looked at the details, I think using a forward-declare
> > > to avoid including relcache.h in visibilitymap.h might be a reasonably
> > > non-painful fix.
> >
> > I like that idea, but I didn't find an appropriate existing header for
> > forward-declaration of Relation. relation.h isn't suitable, because
> > it includes primnodes.h. A separate header for just
> > forward-definition of Relation seems too much.
>
> I was just thinking of doing something like the attached.
I see now. I think I'm rather favoring splitting visibilitymap.h.
> > > TOH, in the long run it might be worth the effort
> > > to split visibilitymap.h to separate useful file-contents knowledge
> > > from backend function declarations.
> >
> > I've drafted a patch splitting visibilitymap_maros.h from
> > visibilitymap.h. What do you think?
>
> I'd name it visibilitymapdefs.h or such, mostly because that's what other
> headers are named like...
Good point. The revised patch is attached.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
