Re: Mark btree_gist functions as PARALLEL SAFE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Mark btree_gist functions as PARALLEL SAFE
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdsYD6pTi-HJi+q1K=cFdbYYvZ2K619s=WwrNde-=KuNgQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Mark btree_gist functions as PARALLEL SAFE  ("Winfield, Steven" <Steven.Winfield@gam.com>)
Responses Re: Mark btree_gist functions as PARALLEL SAFE  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:48 PM Winfield, Steven
<Steven.Winfield@gam.com> wrote:
> Done - thanks again.

This patch looks good to me.

I've rechecked it marks all the functions as parallel safe by
installing an extension and querying the catalog.  I've also rechecked
that there is nothing suspicious in these functions in terms of
parallel safety.  I did just minor adjustments in migration script
comments.

I'm going to push this if no objections.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning and postgres_fdw optimisations for multi-tenancy
Next
From: Zhenghua Lyu
Date:
Subject: Volatile Functions in Parallel Plans