Re: POC: Better infrastructure for automated testing of concurrency issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: POC: Better infrastructure for automated testing of concurrency issues
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdsTeb+hBT5=qxghjNG_cHcJLDaNQ9sdy9vNwBF2E2PuZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to POC: Better infrastructure for automated testing of concurrency issues  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: POC: Better infrastructure for automated testing of concurrency issues
List pgsql-hackers
Hi!

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 3:09 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:42 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thank you for your feedback!
>
> It would be nice to use this patch to test things that are important
> but untested inside vacuumlazy.c, such as the rare
> HEAPTUPLE_DEAD/tupgone case (grep for "Ordinarily, DEAD tuples would
> have been removed by..."). Same is true of the closely related
> heap_prepare_freeze_tuple()/heap_tuple_needs_freeze() code.

I'll continue work on this patch.  The rebased patch is attached.  It
implements stop events as configure option (not runtime GUC option).

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled