Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdsSAyeRHd6Z_n=dNv0WbUeW5eYD0rDN3xeqO+8Q_H4uaw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
Putting that in a couple of words.
1. Table AM with a 6-byte TID.
2. Table AM with a custom locator format, which could be TID-like.
3. Table AM with no locators.

Getting into having #1 first to work out would already be really
useful for users.

What exactly would be useful for *users*?  Any kind of API itself is completely useless for users, because they are users, not developers.  Storage API could be useful for developers to implement storage AMs whose in turn could be useful for users.  Then while saying that #1 is useful for users, it would be nice to keep in mind particular storage AMs which can be implemented using #1.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TRUE and true