On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 8:17 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:02 PM Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 6/7/19 9:00 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 03:44:14PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > Or is that not worth bothering except on HEAD? Thoughts?
> >
> > Personally I don't think it's that critical, but not bothered either way.
> > Presumably no-one has complained so far anyway (I only chanced upon the missing
> > GUC description because I was poking about looking for examples of custom
> > GUC handling...)
>
> I think it worth maintaining consistent documentation and GUC
> descriptions in back branches. So, I'm +1 for backpatching.
>
> I'm going to commit all 3 patches (documentation, GUC description,
> documentation indentation) on no objections.
Pushed!
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
