On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski < >> It seems to me that any circle with radius of any Infinity should become a >> [-Infinity .. Infinity, -Infinity .. Infinity] box.Then you won't have >> NaNs, and index structure shouldn't be broken.
> We probably should produce [-Infinity .. Infinity, -Infinity .. Infinity] > box for any geometry containing inf or nan.
Hm, we can do better in at least some cases, eg for a box ((0,1),(1,inf)) there's no reason to give up our knowledge of finite bounds for the other three boundaries. But certainly for a NaN circle radius what you suggest seems the most sensible thing to do.
