Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfds7rT_+6oTyPOQ+XH7dfb6ucnBVrfJc-mbAFrctNy847Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
On 11/26/13 15:34, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
What's your plans about GIN now? I tried to rebase packed posting lists
with head. But I found that you've changed interface of placeToPage
function. That's conflicts with packed posting lists, because
dataPlaceToPageLeaf needs not only offset number to describe place to
insert item pointer. Do you like to commit rework of handling GIN
incomplete splits before?

Yeah, I'm planning to get back to this patch after committing the incomplete splits patch. I think the refactoring of the WAL-logging that I did in that patch will simplify this patch, too. I'll take a look at Michael's latest comments on the incomplete splits patch tomorrow, so I should get back to this on Thursday or Friday.

Should I try to rebase this patch now or you plan to do it yourself? Some changes like "void *insertdata" argument make me think you have some particular plan to rebase this patch, but I didn't get it exactly.

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov. 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rajeev rastogi
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO: Split out pg_resetxlog output into pre- and post-sections
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7873: pg_restore --clean tries to drop tables that don't exist