Thanks, for suggestions.
On Sun 02. 07. 2023 at 10:18 Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. For comment "On success, the result list is ordered by pathkeys.", I
> think it'd be more accurate if we say something like "On success, the
> result list is ordered by pathkeys or a prefix list of pathkeys."
> considering the possibility of incremental sort.
>
> 2. The comment below is not true anymore.
>
> /*
> * Note: for any failure to match, we just return NIL immediately.
> * There is no value in matching just some of the pathkeys.
> */
> We should either remove it or change it to emphasize that we may return
> a prefix of the pathkeys for incremental sort.
Comments are updated now.
> BTW, would you please add the patch to the CF to not lose track of it?
Submitted <https://commitfest.postgresql.org/43/4433/>
--
Best regards
Miroslav
