Re: How to specify/mock the statistic data of tables in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Felix.徐 |
---|---|
Subject | Re: How to specify/mock the statistic data of tables in PostgreSQL |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAPmhLM2XXZ1fX75ECR2aJb7sZUPwu4uFvxUn74T0ho0G9K=oiQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: How to specify/mock the statistic data of tables in PostgreSQL (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: How to specify/mock the statistic data of tables in PostgreSQL
|
List | pgsql-general |
I see, thanks.
I'm looking into the source code of statistic part now, and I'm a little confused about the column "staop" presented in table pg_statistic,
in the pg_statisitc.h, the comment says:
/* ----------------
* To allow keeping statistics on different kinds of datatypes,
* we do not hard-wire any particular meaning for the remaining
* statistical fields. Instead, we provide several "slots" in which
* statistical data can be placed. Each slot includes:
* kind integer code identifying kind of data (see below)
* op OID of associated operator, if needed
* numbers float4 array (for statistical values)
* values anyarray (for representations of data values)
* The ID and operator fields are never NULL; they are zeroes in an
* unused slot. The numbers and values fields are NULL in an unused
* slot, and might also be NULL in a used slot if the slot kind has
* no need for one or the other.
* ----------------
*/
And,
//line 194 : In a "most common values" slot, staop is the OID of the "=" operator used to decide whether values are the same or not.
//line 206 : A "histogram" slot describes the distribution of scalar data. staop is the OID of the "<" operator that describes the sort ordering.
....
I don't understand the function of staop here, how is it used in optimizer, is there any example ? thanks!
2014/1/10 Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Ah, I forgot to mention this point about how planner uses correlationOn Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 10-Jan-2014, at 19:42, "ygnhzeus" <ygnhzeus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> So correlation is not related to the calculation of selectivity right? If I
> force PostgreSQL not to optimize the join order (by setting
> join_collapse_limit and from_collapse_limit to 1) , is there any other
> factor that may affect the structure of execution plan regardless of the
> data access method.
>
> 2014-01-10
> ________________________________
> ygnhzeus
> ________________________________
> 发件人:Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
> 发送时间:2014-01-10 22:00
> 主题:Re: [GENERAL] How to specify/mock the statistic data of tables in
> PostgreSQL
> 收件人:"ygnhzeus"<ygnhzeus@gmail.com>
> 抄送:"pgsql-general"<pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
>
>
>
> AFAIK, correlation is involved in calculation of the costs that are used for
> deciding the type of access.If the correlation is low, index scan can lead
> to quite some random reads, hence leading to higher costs.
>
for access method selection.
And selectivity is a function of statistical distribution of column
values described in pg_statistic by histograms, most common values
(with their occurrence frequencies), number of distinct values, etc.
It has nothing to do with correlation.
--
Amit Langote
pgsql-general by date: