On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 7:54 PM Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im> wrote:
> On Sun Mar 30, 2025 at 4:39 AM PDT, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 30/03/2025 14:32, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> On 30/03/2025 13:28, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> >>> Another thing I noticed is $SUBJECT: I think “if lock could not
> >>> immediately acquired” should be “if lock could not be immediately
> >>> acquired”. Attached is a patch for that.
> >>
> >> Yep. And there are more instances of the same typo in other such
> >> flush_cb functions, if you search for "immediately acquired".
>
> +1 for chainging other occurrences of this in other pgstat_*.c files.
>
> > While we're at it, the comment feels a bit awkward to me anyway. Maybe
> > rephrase it to "If nowait is true and the lock could not be immediately
> > acquired, returns false without flushing the entry. Otherwise returns true."
>
> This rephrasing does sounds better.
+1 for both suggestions. So I modified the comment as such in each
file with such a flush_cb function. I will push the patch.
Thanks Heikki for the suggestions! Thanks Gurjeet and Tender for the review!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita