Re: doc: CREATE FOREIGN TABLE .. PARTITION OF .. DEFAULT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: doc: CREATE FOREIGN TABLE .. PARTITION OF .. DEFAULT
Date
Msg-id CAPmGK1732iHVjLRdEKqtTCaQbVg8+aazxEWHOhJmT3fyJ-ARbw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: doc: CREATE FOREIGN TABLE .. PARTITION OF .. DEFAULT  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: doc: CREATE FOREIGN TABLE .. PARTITION OF .. DEFAULT
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 9:35 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 2:27 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 9:22 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 7:15 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >  Attached is a patch for that.
> >
> > > I think we should also rewrite the description to match the CREATE
> > > TABLE's text, as in the attached updated patch.
> >
> > Actually, I thought the description would be OK as-is, because it says
> > “See the similar form of CREATE TABLE for more details”, but I agree
> > with you; it’s much better to also rewrite the description as you
> > suggest.
>
> I would probably just update the synopsis. It's not very hard to
> figure out what's likely to happen even without clicking through the
> link, so it seems like it's just being long-winded to duplicate the
> stuff here. But I don't care much if you feel otherwise.

It looks like there are pros and cons.  I think it’s a matter of
preference, though.

I thought it would be an improvement, but I agree that we can live
without it, so I changed my mind; I'll go with my version.  I think we
could revisit this later.

> > I’ll commit the patch unless Robert wants to.
>
> Please go ahead.

OK

Thanks!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson