Re: A problem about partitionwise join - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: A problem about partitionwise join
Date
Msg-id CAPmGK16jVjvtCtw387VsGTQ2jz8GCwpHgghLskyth8LPoOqZZQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A problem about partitionwise join  (Richard Guo <riguo@pivotal.io>)
Responses Re: A problem about partitionwise join  (Richard Guo <riguo@pivotal.io>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:08 PM Richard Guo <riguo@pivotal.io> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:03 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 08:35:33PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> > I've just started reviewing this patch.  One comment I have for now
>> > is: this is categorized into Bug Fixes, but we have a workaround at
>> > least to the regression test case in the patch (ie, just reorder join
>> > clauses), so this seems to me more like an improvement than a bug fix.
>>
>> Hmm.  Agreed.  Changed the category and moved to next CF.

> thanks Michael for the change.

+1

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Nancarrow
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq sslpassword parameter and callback function
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join