Re: problem with RETURNING and update row movement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: problem with RETURNING and update row movement
Date
Msg-id CAPmGK15o_0FigyoO98vB2d5o-ooruHJYMQ2aDmnny9MfZaqS-g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: problem with RETURNING and update row movement  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Amit-san,

On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 2:55 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> However, I noticed that having system columns like ctid, xmin, etc. in
> the RETURNING list is now broken and maybe irrepairably due to the
> approach we are taking in the patch.  Let me show an example:
>
> drop table foo;
> create table foo (a int, b int) partition by list (a);
> create table foo1 (c int, b int, a int);
> alter table foo1 drop c;
> alter table foo attach partition foo1 for values in (1);
> create table foo2 partition of foo for values in (2);
> create table foo3 partition of foo for values in (3);
> create or replace function trigfunc () returns trigger language
> plpgsql as $$ begin new.b := 2; return new; end; $$;
> create trigger trig before insert on foo2 for each row execute
> function trigfunc();
> insert into foo values (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3);
> update foo set a = 2 from (values (1), (2), (3)) s(x) where a = s.x
> returning tableoid::regclass, ctid, xmin, xmax, *;
>  tableoid |      ctid      | xmin |    xmax    | a | b | x
> ----------+----------------+------+------------+---+---+---
>  foo2     | (4294967295,0) |  128 | 4294967295 | 2 | 2 | 1
>  foo2     | (0,3)          |  782 |          0 | 2 | 2 | 2
>  foo2     | (0,4)          |  782 |          0 | 2 | 2 | 3
> (3 rows)
>
> During foo1's update, it appears that we are losing the system
> information in the physical tuple initialized during ExecInsert on
> foo2 during its conversion back to foo1's reltype using the new code.
>  I haven't been able to figure out how to preserve the system
> information in HeapTuple contained in the destination slot across the
> conversion.  Note we want to use the latter to project the RETURNING
> list.

Thanks for pointing that out!

> By the way, you'll need two adjustments to even get this example
> working, one of which is a reported problem that system columns in
> RETURNING list during an operation on partitioned table stopped
> working in PG 12 [1] for which I've proposed a workaround (attached).
> Another is that we forgot in our patch to "materialize" the virtual
> tuple after conversion, which means slot_getsysattr() can't find it to
> access system columns like xmin, etc.

Ok, I’ll look at those closely.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Can a background worker exist without shared memory access for EXEC_BACKEND cases?
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Yet another issue with step generation in partition pruning