Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw
Date
Msg-id CAPmGK15LdtLk_QYoV6Catr35HdY3qRLdReLZrdp2U2Fak=pE2w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 12:49 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> This discussion tickles a concern I've had for awhile: do we really
> know that modern postgres_fdw would work with an 8.3 server (never
> mind 8.1)?  How many of us are in a position to test or debug such
> a setup?  The discussions we've had around old-version compatibility
> for pg_dump and psql seem just as relevant here.
>
> In short, I'm wondering if we should move up the goalposts and only
> claim compatibility back to 9.2.
>
> It'd be even better if we had some routine testing to verify that
> such cases work.  I'm not volunteering to make that happen, though.

+1 to both.  Unfortunately, I do not think I will have time for that, though.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add LSN <-> time conversion functionality
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: btree: implement dynamic prefix truncation (was: Improving btree performance through specializing by key shape, take 2)