Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join
Date
Msg-id CAPmGK158Rzfj7doxUuDF2_igRnsmm+X4gi+bLr73J8-pEghefg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:09 PM amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:03 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I started reviewing this.  Here is my initial review comments:
>>
>> * 0001-Hash-partition-bound-equality-refactoring-v22.patch

>> However, I don't think it's a good idea to do this
>> refactoring, because that would lead to duplicating the code to check
>> whether two given hash bound collections are equal in
>> partition_bounds_equal() and partition_hash_bounds_merge() that will
>> be added by the main patch, after all.  To avoid that, how about
>> calling partition_bounds_equal() from partition_hash_bounds_merge() in
>> the main patch, like the attached?

> Agree, your changes look good to me, thanks for working on it.

Cool!  Thanks for reviewing!

Sorry for the delay.  I was busy with something else recently.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel grouping sets
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs