Thanks for the quick turnaround! I considered only changing the type of currWithOids but thought it may make sense to change both for uniformity as well as future proofing against a similar issue being introduced again moving forward. In any case, this seems like a good, minimal fix--thanks again!
On 01/11/2018 20:56, Derek Nelson wrote: > Hello PG community! I'm one of the PipelineDB developers (PostgreSQL > extension) and as we've begun adding support for PG 11 our test > infrastructure identified an issue with dumping/restoring tables created > WITH OIDs. Naturally this also affects pg_upgrade. > > If a table is created WITH OIDS, dumped and then restored, the resulting > table will not contain the OID column.
Good catch. It's actually only if the affected table is the first table in the output (or perhaps some other narrow circumstances). We do have a test case for WITH OIDS tables, but that table ends up not the first in the output.
I propose to apply the attached patch. It's slightly different from yours in that I don't think we need to change the type of the withOids field. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services