On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Would it be correct to say that if ALL is specified then a message is queued
> no matter what. If DISTINCT is specified then it is only queued if no
> message with the same channel and argument is already queued for delivery.
Yes, exactly.
> Using DISTINCT can never decrease the total number of messages to be sent.
This sentence does not sound true. DISTINCT is the default, old
behaviour. It *can* decrease total number of messages (by
deduplication)
> I've found the deduplication functionality of NOTIFY very frustrating in the past
> and I see this as a significant improvement. Sometimes the *number of times*
> something happened is significant too...
yep, same idea here.
Here is my next try, after suggestions from -perf and -hackers list:
* no GUC
* small addition to NOTIFY grammar: NOTIFY ALL/DISTINCT
* corresponding, 3-argument version of pg_notify(text,text,bool)
* updated the docs to include new syntax and clarify behavior
* no hashtable in AsyncExistsPendingNotify
(I don't see much sense in that part; and it can be well done
separately from this)
