Re: RLS without leakproof restrictions? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Dunstan
Subject Re: RLS without leakproof restrictions?
Date
Msg-id CAPPfruzXrFdUfxoHBouo4UGSiBK_BZLEL_1x+dR+kepYSBGEUA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RLS without leakproof restrictions?  ("Martin L. Buchanan" <martinlbuchanan@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi Martin

On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 13:12, Martin L. Buchanan <martinlbuchanan@gmail.com> wrote:

Anyway, Tom if it is feasible to put each tenant into its own database on the same server instance, that is what I recommend.

It is not, unfortunately. For brevity I skipped over some details - the "tenants" are possibly hundreds or thousands of different parts of large organisations and a single application user may be granted access to some or all of them. So strategies involving separate databases or schemas are mostly out.

Thanks

Tom

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Martin L. Buchanan"
Date:
Subject: Re: RLS without leakproof restrictions?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RLS without leakproof restrictions?