Re: Configurable location for extension .control files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Dunstan
Subject Re: Configurable location for extension .control files
Date
Msg-id CAPPfruw9MFDCB_dZwpFXxn+ySg6g1veeqAMGT3S8w4F_EPMHuA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Configurable location for extension .control files  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5 June 2013 05:58, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Yea, I know of Dimitri's work ;). But I really would like this to work
for C extensions as well. For me personally its no problem at all that
this wouldn't work on conservatively configured machines. Heck, I
*don't* want it to work on production machines. But being able to
configure a dev machine to allow it would be very helpful.

Just the other day I was looking at what it would take to drop some extra compiled extensions somewhere that the Mac Postgres.app could find them, and was mildly disappointed to see that it would have to be inside the app bundle itself, so they would then disappear on upgrade etc. The more maccy way to install extensions for a user app generally is to stick them under ~/Library/<appname>.

Note that Postgres.app is very much an application developer workstation targeted distribution, so the security issues don't really come into the picture. It would also be enough in this case to allow multiple paths to be compiled in rather than pulled from postgresql.conf, but either would work.

Cheers

Tom

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: amul sul
Date:
Subject: Re: create a git symbolic-ref for REL9_3_STABLE
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewind, a tool for resynchronizing an old master after failover