I have a users table which contains ~70 million rows that looks like this:
Column | Type |
-------------+-------------------+
id | integer |
first_name | character varying |
last_name | character varying |
category_id | integer |
Indexes:
"users_id_idx" btree (id)
"users_category_id_first_name_last_name_idx" btree (category_id, first_name, last_name)
I'm trying to retrieve the ids for each (first_name, last_name) couple for one specific category_id.
The query that I'm currently doing is the following:
select array_agg(id)
from users
where category_id = 5432
group by first_name, last_name;
For which the explain analyze output is the following:
GroupAggregate (cost=618461.35..626719.42 rows=26881 width=19) (actual time=1683.139..2613.386 rows=102943 loops=1)
Group Key: first_name, last_name
-> Sort (cost=618461.35..620441.86 rows=792206 width=19) (actual time=1683.116..2368.904 rows=849428 loops=1)
Sort Key: first_name, last_name
Sort Method: external merge Disk: 25304kB
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on users (cost=26844.16..524595.92 rows=792206 width=19) (actual time=86.046..229.469 rows=849428 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (category_id = 5432)
Heap Blocks: exact=7938
-> Bitmap Index Scan on users_category_id_first_name_last_name_idx (cost=0.00..26646.11 rows=792206 width=0) (actual time=85.006..85.006 rows=849428 loops=1)
Index Cond: (category_id = 5432)
What seems to greatly decrease the performance of the query is the "Sort Method: external merge Disk: 7526kB."
Is it possible to aggregate the ids without doing a sort ?
If not, what other options, apart from increasing the work_mem, do I have ?
Thanks,
Alexis
