On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
It shouldn't be terribly costly. One thing you might consider, if you're wrapping the statements in transactions anyway, is to use SET LOCAL whose effects won't last beyond the transaction. I don't think this will make any notable difference speed-wise, but it just seems a tad cleaner if the timeouts don't persist.
