Hi,
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:48 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I think it'd be good if we could guard against b) via an isolation
> test. It's more painful to do that for a), due to the unreliability of
> stats at the moment (we have some tests, but they take a long time).
Thanks for your advise, and agreed.
I added a new (but minimal) isolation test for the case of tid scan.
(v12 and HEAD will be failed this test. v11 and HEAD with my patch
will be passed)
Best regards,
--
Tatsuhito Kasahara
kasahara.tatsuhito _at_ gmail.com