Re: small improvement of the elapsed time for truncating heap in vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kasahara Tatsuhito
Subject Re: small improvement of the elapsed time for truncating heap in vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAP0=ZVJ0iJ7+8-5HMjFZb=K_mVhOh0L=hdfZfGMSA2hmV+LhmA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: small improvement of the elapsed time for truncating heap in vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: small improvement of the elapsed time for truncating heap invacuum
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 1:07 PM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> For the patch, we can put also the declaration of ru0 into the loop.
Thanks for your reply.
Hmm, certainly that it may be better.

Fix the v2 patch and attached.

Best regards,

-- 
Tatsuhito Kasahara
kasahara.tatsuhito _at_ gmail.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index (consider movingindisclustered to pg_class)